In this exercise, a 2D mathematical model of a trashcan disposing a tray was created in MathIllustrations in the form of a four-bar linkage. Afterwards, the member lengths and coordinates of the model were transferred into Solidworks. Difficulties that I ran into while designing this would include the smooth transition of the tray from the top to the backside of the figure, as well as the accurate transfer of the mathematical model to Solidworks.
The goal of this simulation was to create an accurate model of how fast and with what acceleration four-wheeled cart could travel at over a set distance without tipping a 12 inch 8020 aluminum extrusion. The track and car were simplified into flat platforms to make it easier to establish the correct degrees of freedom for the system. This simplification did not significantly decrease the validity of the simulation, as the velocity profile could still be followed in this configuration. The max theoretical time for the car would be 5.48 seconds, as the forward pass would take 2.74 seconds as seen in the second image of the carousel below.
However, for testing, a delay was needed between the forward and backward passes in order to ensure the bar would not tip. This meant that in the program that was uploaded to the Arduino, the estimated time for the entire travel distance was 5.963 seconds as seen in the third image of the carousel.
During testing, it was realized that the acceleration would need to be much lower than the theoretical one which led the final time to be approximately 11 seconds due to slop in the belt and uneven flooring. The video to the right shows that the bar is able to stay upright for the vast majority of the time it travels, but the bar unfortunately falls at the end due to insufficient slowing of the cart and irregularities in the floor tiles.
In this introductory assignment, the fundamentals of motion analysis and simulation data collection were discussed and practiced. With pre-made pieces, I created a Solidworks assembly with which I carried out subsequent motion studies. The first set of studies involved creating trace paths at different parts of the extension link. This helped to understand how different parts of the assembly traveled during the simulation. The images in the carousel below show the different measurements that were taken. The maximum motor torque with a 20RPM rotational speed was approximately 6 ft-lb. The decreasing motor torque can be explained by the fact that this is a dynamic system, and that the torque will be different depending on the point in the path of the linkage. The maximum reaction force on Bearing 1 is approximately 3 lbf, and for Bearing 2 was zero because the mate could not be solved without using a bushing. The magnitude of the maximum power consumption was approximately 6.3 kW for 600RPM.
In this exercise, a carriage was constructed using a lead screw, a motor controller, a Neema stepper motor, and Repetier host. The goal of this assignment was to learn about basic linear motor control, and how when combined with multiple motors, additional degrees of freedom can be achieved. The new skills gained from this assignment were understanding the basics of G-Code and how to construct a linear motor-controlled system.
The goal of this project was to create an automated wood-burner that would draw a dotted picture of any image that is uploaded to the machine. The primary components of this project were 3 Neema Stepper motors, one toy stepper motor, 3D printed supports and carriages, and GT2 belts. The electronics components consisted of DuPont jumper cables, a motor controller board, Repetier Host, and a dotted image-to-G-Code software.
The design process composed of the creation of a motor holder, X-Carriage, and end-pulley axle holder. After completing these parts, the third axis was created. The main design criteria for the third axis was to hold the wood-burner tightly and go up and down using a rack and pinion system. The structure of the assembly was made out of 8020 Aluminum extrusions, which were cut to size using a chop saw. The holes were drilled using a Bridgeport Manual Mill an tapped manually.
Some of the issues we had during testing were the tolerances of our 3D printed parts. this was especially difficult with out X-Carriage design, as the print orientation on the 3D printers determined whether the GT2 belt would comfortably fit into the grooves.
Copyright © 2025 atharvbp - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.